|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| |||||
|
The IPM Farmer Field School These pages focus on the rice IPM FFS as it was developed
in Indonesia as the standard approach to the design and conduct of an
FFS. The goal is to present a
standard as the basis for appropriate variation. Familiarity with what might be the
standard considered design will enable one to successfully adapt the FFS
approach to other crops.
There have been variations in the standard rice IPM FFS design
related to the number of FFS meetings and number of participants. In both cases the variations have
represented increases. In
some countries the number of meetings of the FFS has been extended to 16
meetings and the number of participants has been increased to 30. When and FFS is conducted in a
crop other than rice, there are necessarily changes based on the various
actors in the typical agroecosystem of that crop (for example plant
physiology, insects, etc.).
The process of any FFS should be the same; it is the content that
would change as the FFS is conducted with different crops. The four principles of the IPM FFS
should always be observed:
The Typical Rice IPM Field SchoolThe IPM Field
School is a field based learning experience for 25 The primary learning material at a Field School is the rice field, which is where most Field School activities take place. The size of the fields of an IPM Field School varies up to a total area of 1,000 m2. Field School plots receive two treatments. A set of plots will be designated to receive an IPM treatment and another set will be designated as non-IPM or Local Treatment. The primary difference between the two is that the non-IPM fields receive a basal treatment of carbofuran and only nitrogen fertiliser (this tends to be standard farmer practice in Indonesia). The IPM fields will receive a balanced fertiliser treatment (NPK) and may be planted at lower densities with wider spacing than is typical of the local farmer treatment if that is appropriate. Other differences in treatments will reflect the decisions of FFS participants. These decisions usually reflect the principle of growing a healthy crop. Because of the importance of the field study plots to the learning process, the Field School meeting place is usually close to the field study plots. Although it is important that the meeting place is out of the direct sun, any simple structure—such as a terrace or bamboo hut—or even a comfortable, shaded area will do. Participants. IPM Farmer Field
Schools are designed for 25 participants. This is not an arbitrary
number. During field
observations, agroecosystem analysis and other activities, farmers divide
into five ‘small groups’ of five participants each. This is an ideal size
for small group discussions.
This number allows for sufficient diversity of opinion without
being so large as to discourage less vocal participants from taking an
active role. Larger groups
may become either chaotic or passive depending on the temperament of the
group. After the Field School
is completed twenty-five farmers constitutes a neighbourhood support group
for IPM of a reasonable size within the context of a
village. Selection of participants takes place at a meeting led by the IPM Field School facilitator with the members of the Farmers Group from which participants will be drawn. At this meeting the Field School process is explained. The facilitator also explains to prospective participants that they will be expected to attend every week for the duration of the season. Prospective participants are given an opportunity to either agree (the ‘learning contract’) or withdraw. Activities. The basic format of an IPM Field
School for farmers consists
of three activities: agroecosystem observation, analysis, and presentation
of results; a ‘special topic’; and a ‘group dynamics’ activity.
Agroecosystem analysis is the Field School’s core activity, and other
activities are designed to support it. Agroecosystem
Analysis. The agroecosystem analysis
process sharpens farmers’ skills in the areas of observation and decision
making and helps develop their powers of critical thinking. The process
begins with small group observations of the IPM and non-IPM plots. During
the observation process participants collect field data—such as the number
of tillers per hill and varieties of insects and their populations—and
samples of insects and plants. These data are collected from ten rice
hills. The facilitator is present throughout the observation to help participants in their
observations. | |||||||
| Concepts and Cases << previous | next >> | ||||||